The defender looks to be the right fit for Old Trafford, but the deal should have been pushed through earlier in the summer
In May, Ed Woodward asked Leicester City how much they wanted for Harry Maguire and was told 80m. On Monday, the master of negotiation completed the deal, paying 80m finally to secure the centre-back six days before Manchester Uniteds first game of the season.
Perhaps such mockery is a little unfair, given interest from Manchester City did threaten briefly to push up the price but only a little. United have got their man but they would have been far better off getting him earlier so he could have a full pre-season, sweating his way through Ole Gunnar Solskjrs taxing new fitness regimen and learning what it is to play alongside Chris Smalling. Beyond that, though, this seems like a move that makes a lot of sense.
At times towards the end of last season United fielded a back four comprising only players who had been at the club in Alex Fergusons time. They desperately needed to refresh their defence. Their board also seems to have made a decision at some point to focus on young players with Premier League experience but who are on the way up, rather than paying huge sums for pre-formed stars such as Alexis Snchez and Paul Pogba.
Maguire fulfils the first criterion and just about answers the second. At 26 and with 20 caps, he is coming close to full maturity but is perhaps not quite there yet. And it is easy to see why Solskjr should have been so keen to sign him, why he did not want to turn to other options such as Toby Alderweireld or Kalidou Koulibaly.
It is not just that Maguire is an excellent defender, big and strong and good in the air. Or that he is adept at carrying the ball out from the back. Or even that he prefers to operate as the left of the two central defenders, unlike anybody else in the United squad other than Marcos Rojo. It is the sense of control and authority he exudes. Even if he does not wear the armband Maguire is a leader, and this is a defence that in recent years has desperately needed leadership.
The fee has raised eyebrows, particularly when Alderweireld was available for 25m, and breaking the world record for a defender is not something United will have done lightly. It may also be noted that Uniteds four costliest signings are now more expensive than Citys record (based on the euro value at the time of the deal). This is a perpetual problem for Woodward: everything he does looks ham-fisted by comparison with City who, whatever qualms there may be about the source of their immense wealth, have invested it with almost superhuman acuity.
But 80m is perhaps not so unreasonable. The record for the most expensive defender before Maguire was held by Virgil van Dijk who cost Liverpool 75m when, after a protracted pursuit, they signed him from Southampton in January 2018. Van Dijk has excelled and his value now would be significantly in excess of that. Nobody could seriously dispute that, at least within the inflated world of modern transfer fees, he has been worth every penny.
Original Article : HERE ;
This post was curated & Posted using : RealSpecific
If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.
And ... Don't forget to have fun!